the BBC up to its tricks again- acting as a PR agent for the corporates & globalists
The BBC have done it again…. Last night (16 June 2020,) BBC Radio Four aired “The 5G Con that could make you sick” [sic] ….(see below for a complaint sent to them Ed.)
You can feel where the wind blows from the start, but it is very shrewdly put together and very insidious. They do give the other side some time, just about, but it is very obviously skewed from the beginning and the latter part zooms in on Sacha Stone and his cohorts (who do not help our Movement at all) trying to sell extremely expensive products….. They also very clearly state that Electro-Sensitivity is psychological.
This needs to be critiqued, but it needs to be done well for these guys know what they are doing. I will give it a try in my crude way, but hope that someone can add some more sophisticated arguments.
By the way, they say that 5G is using the same frequencies as before but more effectively?? Now there is something factually incorrect, if you ask me…. And of course, they do not mention pulsation at all.
Response to the piece by way of a complaint.
Following upon my email about BBC bias (see furthest down) please find below my complaint to the BBC – point one is thanks to a friend who has his head screwed on. If you would like to copmplain as well, kindly go to: https://www.bbc.co.uk/contact/complaints
You can also call the complaints number (I have done both) but recently they only allow one minute recorded complaints due to the Corona Crisis. Their number is: 0370 010 0222
Feel free to use and improve upon any of this:
Dear BBC,
I listened to your programme “The 5G Con that makes you sick” which was aired on the 16th of June at 8pm. Whilst I do not question the programme makers good intentions, I was surprised not so much by what I heard, but by what I did not hear. May I kindly suggest that in your next programme about 5G you include the following:
1. Reference to the thousands of peer-reviewed studies which show clear evidence of harm from existing EMR.Tens of thousands of scientific papers (linked herein) have cited apparent connections to the role of EMFs in a multitude of adverse health effects, including depression, infertility, cancer, damage to DNA/gene expression, oxidative stress, pregnancy complications, melatonin production, neurological disorders, immune dysfunction, alzheimers/dementia, leukaemia, and many, many more:
Over 1,600 scientific papers can be found here: https://www.powerwatch.org.uk/science/studies.asp
Another 4000+ studies can be found here: http://www.bioinitiative.org
Another 1000+ studies here: www.justproveit.net
And another 23,840 studies also linked here: www.EMF-portal.org
2. Reference to the many serious and independent scientists who are risking their careers to point out the very real danger from EMR to Humans and Wildlife. Scientists to approach would be Dr Erica-Mallery Blythe, Professor Olle Johansson,. Dr Martin Pall and Dr Einar Flydal, to name but a few. These scientists are particularly concerned about the harm caused by the pulsation of artificial frequencies, something which I did not hear mentioned at all.
3. Focus on the many serious campaigners (not necessarily the loud-mouths) who have been working for a long time to raise this issue, not in a conspirational manner – nor to make money from dubious gadgets – but because they have real concerns based on serious science and on their Human Right to Informed Consent, enshrined in UN Law. These people rightly feel that they are being silenced in today’s polarised and far too simplistic Media coverage.
4. Mention of the serious harm to the Environment that will be caused by launching thousands of satellites (53:000 planned) in the lower atmosphere, erecting billions of new transmitters and producing trillions of new 5G gadgets, as well as the enormous amount of Energy needed to power the coveted “Internet of Things.” Increased Carbon Emissions, damage to the Ozone Layer, Resource Depletion as well as a huge impact on the view of our night sky – to the alarm of Astronomers across the Globe.
I look forward to your reply and a future programme based on joined-up thinking to balance the one-eyed bias of the one I just heard. This kind of programme would be in line with the high quality that one expects from the BBC.
Many thanks in advance,
Yours sincerely,