MP for Chelsea and Fulham – correspondence re 5G

MP for Chelsea and Fulham – correspondence re 5G

image_pdfimage_print
Dear Brian
I sent a lot of emails to my MP Greg Hands and thought would interest you,  I have copied two that i think are very  relevant as follows
Thank you for reading and please share on your 5g exposed site Wishing you a lovely day Brenda :}}
From: HANDS, Greg <HANDSG@parliament.uk>
Sent: 03 July 2019 02:55 PM
To: brenda dyer
Subject: RE: 5G!!

Dear Ms Dyer,

Thank you for contacting me about 5G. I am not familiar with the monitoring of exposure to radio raves in the US, although it does sound as though little is being done there in the way of monitoring. I am reassured, however, that this is not the case in the UK. I have taken this matter up already on behalf of another constituent with the Department of Health and Social Care, whose response I attach. As the Department’s reply explains, tests have shown that maximum exposure levels were found to be hundreds of times below guidance levels set by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, which itself is a body recognised by the World Health Organisation (WHO).

I am reassured that Public Health England have been adequately monitoring any potential threat to public health and will continue to do so in future, revising its advice as and when necessary in light of new information. I hope that you are similarly reassured, and that you find the additional information – such as where to find published information about radiofrequency topics – helpful.

Thank you again for taking the time to contact me.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

Greg Hands

Member of Parliament for Chelsea and Fulham

 

 

 

From: brenda dyer <brendadye17@hotmail.com>
Sent: 02 July 2019 18:48
To: HANDS, Greg <HANDSG@parliament.uk>; Greg hands <mail@greghands.com>
Subject: 5G!!

 

Dear Greg Hands

There is an overwhelming body of scientific evidence in peer-reviewed literature including 10,000 studies and three large recent studies which show that electromagnetic radiation (EMR) from wireless radiation is a biohazard.

EMR has been clearly linked in a large US study with heart and brain tumours. It has been shown to harm humans (especially children) and wildlife, including bees and plants. 5G technology will vastly increase our exposure to EMR, including increasing amounts of high-frequency radiation, which has been shown in studies to penetrate the skin and cause damage to cells, organs and the nervous system.

The Public Health England guidelines are out-of-date and do not account for the latest research. 5G has been banned in cities including Brussels and Geneva as well as parts of the US over health concerns. Hundreds of scientists, doctors and environmentalists are calling for an urgent ban on 5G.

5G is experimental technology which will be rolled out at dense levels in London so that there is not a place where people are not exposed.

To impose it on populations without adequate safety testing constitutes a breach of the Nuremberg Code of ethics. We the public have not been consulted on the rollout of 5G and we have not given our consent to it. Kensington and Chelsea Council  and London has a duty of care to its citizens as written in the Constitution. The council should be insisting that the safety of this technology is proven by independent studies before imposing it on every one of us 24/7″

Please acknowledge this email

Looking Forward to hearing from you and your views!

Brenda Dyer

Dear Greg Hands
Thank you for your email
I have and continue to do my research that unlike you I  do my own research and suggest that you should do the same for the sake of yourself and you family as everyone in the country will be effected and there will be no escape for anyone!
 
It is not a good idea to take the word of someone or some group that has been paid by a big telecommunications company to look the other way, if you are confident Greg Hands that the information you have been given is correct that is fine…
 
The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) guidelines (devised in 1998 and currently used in England), are obsolete, formulated in the late 1980s by IEEE and are based on thermally induced (tissue heating) effects. The ICNIRP and IEEE/FCC public “safety limits” do not take into account non thermal biological effects nor take into account prolonged, low-intensity exposures

ICNIRP guidelines are meant for short term exposure (averaged over 6 minutes) and not meant for long term exposure.
 
THE reply I got from Greg hands
 
From: HANDS, Greg <HANDSG@parliament.uk>
Sent: 18 July 2019 11:33 AM
To: brenda dyer <brendadye17@hotmail.com>
Subject: RE: Join for The 5G (wireless) Crisis Summit!

Dear Ms Dyer,

 

Thank you for contacting me with your concerns about 5G.

I believe it is vital that the UK has the digital infrastructure it needs to compete and grow in the modern economy. The Government wants the UK to be a world leader in 5G and to ensure that the majority of the population have access to a 5G signal by 2027. 5G is still in its development stages and is likely to be rolled out as part of a combination of technologies, including those already in use, such as 4G, Wi-Fi, as well as 5G new radio.

Extensive research has been carried out on radio waves and the Government does not anticipate any negative effects on public health. I understand that existing technical standards, which take into account international guidelines and research on non-ionizing radiation, are expected to be followed throughout the development of 5G products and networks. I am assured that as 5G continues to develop, the Government will work with Public Health England to monitor available evidence and take any necessary action.

Thank you again for taking the time to contact me.

 

 

Yours sincerely,

 

Greg Hands

Member of Parliament for Chelsea and Fulham

From: brenda dyer <brendadye17@hotmail.com>
Sent: 04 September 2019 21:45
To: HANDS, Greg <HANDSG@parliament.uk>
Subject: Climate Change

 

Dear Greg Hands

 

Thank you for your letter updating about the Climate change dated 13th August 2019.

I see that you are a Founding Member of the Conservative Environment  Network.

 

I do find it quite hard to believe that you care so much about our Earth and the climate yet you condone the 5G roll-out!

 

I feel this is an contraction that you support the Climate change yet you support wholly the intention to have the whole of the UK to be Blanketed in the Radio Frequency

 

I am not sure if you are aware that a lot of Trees will have to be cut down to make way for the Short Wave Microwave Radio Frequency and these are not being replaced.

This is because the Trees interfere with the 5G Radio Frequency and stop the connections for 5G to work

  Ironic that;  all Life including Humans need trees to breath and survive yet the trees will not let the Frequency through; not only do they supply us with oxygen but are actually trying to protect us from the Short Wave Microwave Radio Frequency!

 

Human life could not exist if there were no trees. A mature leafy tree produces as much oxygen in a season as 10 people inhale in a year. What many people don’t realize is that the forest also acts as a giant filter that cleans the air we breathe

 

I thought this might interest you as it is information about what 5G means copied below

 

Dear Brenda,

 

Thank you for your email, and I appreciate your continued strong interest in this matter. However, you have a different opinion to DHSC and PHE, whose view Greg agrees with. I am sorry that these views cannot be reconciled. I would add that every healthcare body, regulator and otherwise officially accountable organisation that would be liable if 5G was found to cause harm is adamant that 5G is safe.

 

Best wishes,

Charlie

 

 

 

Charlie Fisher | Parliamentary Assistant to Rt Hon Greg Hands MP

Member of Parliament for Chelsea and Fulham

House of Commons, London, SW1A 0AA | 020 7219 6801 | www.greghands.com


Comments are closed.