Stop 5G International Appeal update

Stop 5G International Appeal update

image_pdfimage_print
Dear all
Some while back I saw that David at david@unfamilylawreform.co.uk had an exchange with Milton Keynes Council. I was once again shocked at the ignorance and complacency exhibited by David’s correspondents.
I wanted to get back to David with further evidence that he could present, but it has taken me some time to finish that particular project.  Finally, though, I have managed to do so.  I entitled my article “Chronolo-5G: How the Telecom Companies Are Losing the Battle to Impose 5G Against the Will of the People” because it is intended to be a chronology of the pushback against 5G in 2019, but unfortunately Global Research gave the article a rather undescriptive name: 5G Cell Phone Radiation: How the Telecom Companies Are Losing the Battle to Impose 5G Against the Will of the People: https://www.globalresearch.ca/telcos-losing-battle-impose-5g/5691065.
It is a chronology of as much of the information as possible that has been published in 2019 showing the unutterable madness and criminality of rolling out 5G.  I would hope that, as this is all new information in 2019, campaigners can use these devastating facts in order to help their campaigning.  I draw your attention in particular to some health aspects: highest suicide rate in the US since WWII, first three-year drop in life expectancy since WWI, one in two newborns expected to be autistic by 2025, British insurers confirm premature death trend …  There is more such horrendous material proving that we stand at the very edge of catastrophe and must turn back now.  We must eliminate all WiFi and not just 5G, for these reasons (given by Arthur Firstenberg and published in my last newsletter):
There should be no wireless technology, period. If you have wireless technology at all, you are being irradiated. This business of “low” radiation is wishful thinking and completely contrary to science. “Low levels” is completely meaningless if you are talking about any effects except heating. For all other effects, there is not a dose response. There are no studies showing a dose response, and there are a lot of studies showing the opposite. Pulsed, digital, high-bandwidth radiation kills regardless of power. Often the highest exposure levels have very little effect and the near-zero exposure levels kill. Why? Because our cells communicate at
near-zero levels and it is the interference with our own bodies’ internal signals that kills us. The more the external signal matches our tiny internal signals, the greater the harm. I keep on saying this, people nod their heads and they go on demanding “lower” limits like sheep led to the slaughter. The higher the exposure level, the greater the thermal damage. The lower the exposure level, the greater the informational damage. WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY MUST BE BANNED, PERIOD.
It is time for us to adopt a consistent message.  The only safe dose for artificial electromagnetic radiation is ZERO because it is alien to our biology.  Shilly shallying, advising people to paint their walls with lead, buy shungite talismans, try (if at all possible and we know that it must be quite impossible for you, poor dears) to switch off their phones and routers will not do.  We must be clear.  There is one solution only to the 5G threat to all life on Earth: stop all generations of wireless technology right now.  If you believe that this is not possible, you are condemning this campaign to failure and should book yourself a nice beach holiday while you wait out your last few months of life.  You do not debate with a weapon.  You do not compromise with a weapon.  We have computers, we can get cables to plug phones into routers.  We do not need WiFi and it is killing all life on Earth except bacteria (lucky them!).
Another of my most recent articles sets out to document how we came to have 5G (The 5G Dementors Meet the 4G Zombie Apocalypsehttps://www.globalresearch.ca/5g-electromagnetic-mad-zone-poised-self-destruct-5g-dementors-meet-4g-zombie-apocalypse/5689176).  This gives an account of the conspiracy that brought us here.  It is a 5-page article with 12 pages of notes.  As a former UN editor, I always document what I am saying and I recommend a close perusal of the 12 pages of notes for they are illuminating.  I would hope that that information, too, would be a useful tool for campaigning.
A further article, BBC Fake News on 5G Decoded: Health Impacts Denied Despite Overwhelming Scientific Evidence (https://www.globalresearch.ca/online-bbc-fake-news-5g-decoded/5687055) debunks the usual stupid arguments put forward to dispute what the International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space (https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal/) asserts (although disputing the facts is rather pointless since we provided 122 references to support our assertions).   BBC Fake News on 5G Decoded debunks ICNIRP, the World Health Organization and the idea that we have lived for aeons with natural electromagnetic radiation so we don’t need to worry about the artificial version.  I provide hyperlinks throughout to the source material.
I am also attaching my latest newsletter, at the end of which are links to six of the seven previous newsletters (the seventh currently has no home), all of which contain links to some crucial documents and information.  All the newsletters are intended to be read electronically.  I will not be producing any more newsletters as it is too time-consuming (the last one had 208 pages), but am now devoting myself to the production of articles.  The next article will address the dangers of 5G from space and the stratosphere.
I hope that these articles (which I am attaching in case you wish to print and disseminate them) and newsletters will be able to support your campaigning.  5G Cell Phone Radiation: How the Telecom Companies Are Losing the Battle to Impose 5G Against the Will of the People) shows that we are winning the information war hands down.  If officials refuse to listen despite our presentation of the facts, we must move to impose liability and eventually should consider new Nuremberg trials for crimes against humanity.
Good luck with your campaigning!
Claire
Claire Edwards

Comments are closed.