Hello All,

What this email contains:

Lots of interest on the website after people connecting 5G and COVID-19.  I cannot see any direct cause,  The best I can is say there is an indirect connection (compromised immunity) which makes you susceptable to infection,  Hospitals are reporting a lung problem (akin to altitude sickness) which is not due to a virus but have labelled it as CD-19 anyway.  It could well be due to the 60 GHz frequency return path signal of 5G enabled transmitters and CCTV signals.  This frequency destabilises/ionises oxygen molecules which break apart and form other molecules, anyway long story short the 02 molecules often recombines as 03 (ozone, which is toxic) so there is a depletion of breathable oxygen.

Caught up on a lot of reading.  After much silent weeping, I even put myself through the ordeal of reading some of the updated ICNIRP document which has been updated for 5G.  I have added my criticisms below.  It changes nothing in terms of safety unfortunately.

Our borough is not engaging with us.  When it comes to health and environment, it’s all about hitting net zero carbon targets. I think we need more letter writing in Merton but not just from the same old names.  So I encourage everyone to let them know you exist.  The whole system seems to be gamed so that councils are locked into allowing the direction of travel towards 5G/6G etc..smart cities as the excellent letter from Wera Hobhouse MP sets out to the DCMS minister (link to letter below).   PHE solicitors have stated that if public bodies are subject to legal action for harm that has been caused due to EMR, then the PHE are not liable because the body decided to follow their advice. At the same time a public body has no legal ability to stop masts being installed in their constituencies on health grounds, so they are damned if they do and damned if they don’t.  I wouldn’t feel too sorry for the majority of local authorities, they are quite happy to toe the line and not question or engage as fully as required.  For instance Lincoln and others are already installing a smart/AI surveillance system over the 5G network (story below). The roll out is sold in each borough as putting their area at the cutting edge with wireless access. They have a name for their work in this area, Future<insert borough name here> with nice brochures and pdfs, all councils seem to be using the same graphics and fonts.  Obviously they are not local initiatives, it’s centrally driven, but they seek to give a different impression.

By the way, council websites have surveillance tools (more info below), Merton is one of the better ones, it only uses one.  you can check the situation with your council too.  I would download the Brave browser https://brave.com/, I have used it for almost a year and have found it to be fast and reliable, it strips out all the software which IDs you and other nasty adware and bots.

We have a list of streets in Merton where small cell 4G LTE transmitters are being attached to posts near homes.  Thanks to Ingrid for the pic showing this on one street (details below).  After the lock down may be we could leaflet households on these streets.

It feels to me at least, the time has come for supporting legal action.  I have contributed towards through Mark Steele’s legal fund via  https://www.saveusnow.org.uk/ you can also do so directly here https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/let-justice-be-done-though-the/

A useful FOI template, with thanks to saveusnow.org.uk:

NOTICE OF FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 2000 REQUEST

Dear Sirs

Under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, you are requested to please provide the following:

Copies of all commercial [YOUR COUNCIL HERE] public liability insurance policy certificates with what is covered, policy numbers, providers and underwriters held by [YOUR COUNCIL HERE]. In particular, make sure anything regarding ‘pollution liability’, ‘policy enhancement’ and ‘schedules of exclusions’ documents in relation to the commercial public liability insurance policy held by [YOUR COUNCIL HERE].

Copies of the ‘certificate of indemnity’ from [YOUR COUNCIL HERE] that may include the public insurance provider and underwriters, confirming that any injuries, damages or adverse health effects directly or indirectly arising out of, resulting from or contributed to by electromagnetic fields, electromagnetic radiation, electromagnetism, radio waves or noise, wireless RF radiation, microwave radiation, non-ionising radiation emitting devices and equipment.

I require written receipt of this Freedom of Information Request. Sincerely and without ill will, vexation or frivolity,

Yours Sincerely

[ANY NAME HERE]

PLEASE READ: You can use https://www.whatdotheyknow.com to send the Notice over the Internet, but we always recommend to find the FOI page on your Council’s website and send an email. Also, if the Council comes back and says the FOI is over their quota, then send question one and then question two.

DOWNLOAD THE WORD DOC FOR YOUR RECORDS HERE: FOI-Insurance-liability-council-SaveUsNow-SmombieGate

22 APRIL 2020 12 ANTENNA INSTALLATION REFUSED IN PRIMROSE HILL

Application for 12 antennae in Primrose Hill refused.

Hill View Apartments Primrose Hill Road London NW3 3AX

Installation of 12 pole mounted antennas, 2 x 300mm dishes, 4 cabinets and ancillary works thereto at main roof level.

Application number: 2020/0989/P
Application type: GPDO Prior Approval Determination

DecisionPrior Approval Required – Approval Refused  17-04-2020

If you go into the planning application no. 2020/0989/P and look at the officers report. It says this, see below.

Here is the link to the officers report with grounds for refusal.

http://camdocs.camden.gov.uk/HPRMWebDrawer/Record/8177732/file/document?inline

22 APRIL 2020 12 ANTENNA INSTALLATION GIVEN THE GREEN LIGHT IN PORTSMOUTH

The pace of Installations are unaffected by the CV-19 lockdown.  However the ability of public scrutiny is hampered. Councillors asked for the installation of the antennae to be discussed in committee by a group of constituents but there wasn’t time.  See letter here 

If public bodies have to make decisions in a limited time-frame which then excludes time for public scrutiny by those they are supposed to represent then the system is not working for both parties.  It only operates in a way that benefits corporate business interest.

INSTALLATION OF 4G LTE TRANSMITTERS NEAR HOMES IN MERTON

The following are the locations where “small cell” wireless telecoms infrastructure has been installed:

Arthur Road, Wimbledon Park – on LC 038

Arthur Road, Wimbledon Park – on LC 041

Arthur Road, Wimbledon Park – on LC 044

Havelock Road, Wimbledon – on LC 003 SEE PICTURE 

Church Road, Wimbledon – on LC 018

Plough Lane, Wimbledon – on LC 014

London Road, Mitcham – on LC 004

Requests have been received from Arqiva for the following as possible locations for future deployment of “small cell” equipment:

Connaught Gardens, Morden – LC 001

Central Road, Morden – LC 010

Kingston Road, Wimbledon / Raynes Park – LCs 050, 069 & 080

The Broadway, Wimbledon – LCs 006, 010 & 015

Hartfield Road, Wimbledon – LC 026

Wimbledon Hill Road, Wimbledon – LCs 004 & 011

Haydons Road, South Wimbledon – LCs 036 & 043

Rowan Road, Streatham – LC 001

Here is an example people simply not being asked about the installation of transmitters on their streets.  The only stakeholders involved are local councils who agree to rent public infrastructure use (pushed by central government rules) and international corporations.

This is how it goes: O2 decides where it needs to boost coverage. They use Nokia (currently) which supply them with relatively cheap, easy to install hardware to do this. Arqiva with their agreements with councils install the transmitters on our poles on our streets. People wake up to see strange square boxes attached to poles.

This is Arqiva’s position on safety. They link to a BBC video on safety of transmitters.  Many issues come to mind, I’ll leave you to think about it for yourself.  I’ve made comments on the video on YouTube

HAVING OUR SAY.  LETTING GOVERNMENT KNOW THE TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THEIR ENQUIRY IGNORES HEALTH AND WELFARE OF THE PEOPLE.  DEADLINE FRIDAY 24TH APRIL

MPs launch an inquiry into Broadband and road to 5G to examine Government’s pledge to ensure every home and business in the UK has gigabit-capable broadband by 2025.

https://committees.parliament.uk/work/89/broadband-and-the-road-to-5g/

14 APRIL 2020 NTP DOES NOT PLAN TO CONDUCT 5G STUDIES IN HUMAN POPULATIONS.

From: NTP Support <itss@mail.nih.gov>
Sent: 14 April 2020 16:32
To:
Cc: NIEHS NTP Web Request
Subject: NTPDM-2732 [Done] RE: Contact us

Dear XXX,

Thank you for your email to the National Toxicology Program (NTP) inquiring about funding for the Cell Phone Radio Frequency Radiation study and if 5G tests have been conducted on humans.

The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, a member of the NTP partnership, funded the cell phone studies. NTP does not plan to conduct 5G studies in human populations. A brief description of NTP’s future studies on cell phone radiofrequency radiation is available on its website.

Please contact the NTP Web Team with any additional questions or concerns.

NTP Web Team (contractor)

984-287-3211

ntpwebrequest@niehs.nih.gov

Background on the National Toxicology Program (NTP)

NTP is a federal, interagency program headquartered at National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, which is part of the National Institutes of Health. NTP’s goal is to safeguard the public through research, testing, and analysis to identify substances in the environment that may affect human health.

12TH APRIL 2020 CITY OF LINCOLN COUNCIL HAS BEGUN INSTALLING A MMW WIRELESS SMART CITY SURVEILLANCE NETWORK.

Our towns and cities seem to be in a rush to be twinned with dystopia.  The 60 GHz frequency which has the effect of oxygen absorption is being used for CCTV and public access WiFi backhaul.  The company being used for this is called Siklu and they say using 65-66 GHz will avoid this effect. Here’s the press release.

4TH APRIL 2020 NIGERIA RESEARCHING SAFETY OF 5G BEFORE DEPLOYMENT.  SLOVENIA USES THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE TO HALT 5G ROLL OUT.

Nigerian Government responds to concerns of its citizens. Read the statement.

The Republic of Slovenia has stopped the assignment of the 5G frequency spectrum.  Minister of Public Administration Rudy Medved, has opted for the adoption of the precautionary principle : “I am aware that we will not find a definitive answer, since there has not been one globally. 5G technology has not been established in practice to the extent that studies could produce results by which we could conclusively say that 5G is completely harmless.”

20TH MARCH 2020 UPDATED ICNIRP GUIDELINES RELEASED

Eric van Rongen, the chairman of ICNIRP:  “We know parts of the community are concerned about the safety of 5G and we hope the updated guidelines will help put people at ease.”  Van Rongen is with the Health Council of the Netherlands.  In 2019 he stated: “It [5G] is not set up as a public health experiment but of course you can consider it as such. It will be necessary to gain more information about the exposure and any health problems that might come from an effect of that exposure.”

Updated guidelines can be found here: https://microwavenews.com/short-takes-archive/icnirp-rf-guidelines-2020

The ICNIRP say the 1998 guidelines are fit for purpose but they have been updated for 5G exposures.

The update as they relate to 5G are for frequencies above 6GHz:

-The addition of a restriction for whole body exposure

– The addition of a restriction of < 6 minute exposure to small regions of the body

-The restriction of the maximum exposure permitted over a small region of the body

It is essentially the same document as 1998 because the guidelines contain the same fundamental flaws:

•  It only considers tissue heating as evidence of as absorption of EMF power which would impact health
• It considers harm as a function of dose.  Many papers show this is not the case when it comes to harm to the blood brain barrier where it is affected by specific windows of dose
• Says cell membrane permeability is only affected at v high levels of exposure far above that which causes tissue heating.  This is where Professor Martin Pall takes issue with ICNIRP
• Discounts 2 major studies of our time.  The NTP study and the Ramazzini Institute Study “the statistical methods employed were not sufficient to differentiate between radiofrequency-related and chance differences between treatment conditions; interpretation of the data is difficult due to the high body core temperature changes that resulted from the very high exposure levels used; and no consistency was seen across these two studies. Thus, when considered either in isolation (e.g., ICNIRP 2019) or within the context of other animal and human carcinogenicity research (HCN 2014, 2016), their findings do not provide evidence that radiofrequency EMFs are carcinogenic.”  Those who led the studies have issued rebuttals which can be read here.  The NTP study is probably the most rigorous and peer-reviewed study of its kind to date.
• It omits major areas of health impact and makes a curious distinction between biological and an adverse health effect.  “It is important to note that ICNIRP bases its guidelines on substantiated adverse health effects. This makes the difference between a biological and an adverse health effect an important distinction, where only adverse health effects require restrictions for the protection of humans. Research on the health effects of radiofrequency EMFs has tended to concentrate on a few areas of particular interest and concern, with some other areas receiving little or no attention. There is not sufficient research addressing potential relations between radiofrequency EMFs and the skeletal, muscular, respiratory, digestive, and excretory systems, and so these are not considered further.”

CLAIMANT SUCCESSFULLY WINS APPEAL FOR UNIVERSAL CREDIT ON THE GROUNDS OF ELECTROHYPERSENSITIVITY

The Appeal was held in January 2020. She submitted widely collated medical evidence and had the support of her GP and Neurologist.  Electrohypersensitivity occurs when a person is sensitised to electromagnetic fields, radio and microwave signals from sources such as mobile phones, WIFI and Telecommunication Masts. Proximity, duration, and frequency being key factors of exposure risk. Claimant lived in a second-floor flat in London where she encountered a myriad of signals from a multitude of directions, as well as vertically, up through her feet. She states the collective exposure weakened her receptor and vascular resistance which sent her health spiralling downwards.  It became necessary for her to relocate to accommodation in a rural setting for there to be any hope of recovery.
The claimant is supported by the Charity Electrosensitivity UK (ES-UK) who supports all people who have been sensitised by electromagnetic fields and radiation.

CHECKING MOBILE SIGNAL, INCLUDING 5G, WITH ONE SEARCH

https://www.signalchecker.co.uk/

SURVEILLANCE ON UK COUNCIL WEBSITES

Quick Facts:

• Nearly all councils in the UK permit at least one company to learn about the behaviour of people visiting their websites. Tweet this
• People seeking information about disability, poverty, drugs and alcoholism services are profiled by data brokers on some council websites. Tweet this
• 198 council websites in the UK use the “real-time bidding” (RTB) form of advertising. Real-time bidding is the biggest data breach ever recorded in the UK. Though illegality is not in dispute, the UK Information Commissioner (ICO) has failed to act. Tweet this
• Google owns all five of the top embedded elements loaded by UK council websites, giving it the power to know what virtually anyone in the UK views on council sites. Tweet this
• Over of a quarter of the UK population is served by councils that embed Twitter, Facebook, and others on their websites, leaking data about what sensitive issues people read about to these companies. Tweet this
• 6.9 million people are served by councils that allow data broker LiveRamp to track people on their sites. Until recently, LiveRamp was part of the Acxiom Group, which sold data to Cambridge Analytica. Tweet this
• None of the data collecting companies recorded in this study had received consent from the website visitor to lawfully process data. Tweet this
• This report should spur Elizabeth Denham, the UK Information Commissioner, to finally enforce the GDPR. It is 17 months since formal evidence from Brave and complaints about breaches of data protection laws were filed before the ICO. Tweet this
• Use the Data Leaks Explorer tool to check the council in your local area.

More info here 

TURIN COURT OF APPEAL CONFIRMS HEAD CANCER CAUSED BY MOBILE PHONE

Court in Italy judged in 2017 that an employee’s acoustic neurinoma was caused by use of mobile phone as part of his work.  In December 2019, in The Turin Court of Appeal, The employer INAIL appealed the 2017 judgement.  The appeal court upheld the initial judgement. It’s worth reading this professionally translated verdict.  It has huge implications, it shows how the court recognised clear conflicts of interest in bodies which are setting our safeguards and gives you a flavour of the rigour in arriving at the verdict.

27TH FEBRUARY 2020 LETTER FROM MP FOR BATH TO MINISTER FOR DIGITAL AND CULTURE

I commend Wera Hobhouse MP for this letter about 5G and government liability for damage to health and the curtailing of the democratic responsibility.  It covers

• the prevention of public and local authorities to object to infrastructure roll-out
• the exclusive use of ICNIRP guidelines basis of determining its safety
• its uninsurability in terms of health and privacy
• the exemption PHE from all liability in the event of future legal action relating to adverse health effects resulting from following their guidance
• the impossible position of the public and their local authorities.  PHE’s solicitors: “if it be alleged that a public body now or in the future acted unlawfully in placing reliance on the (PHE) guidance, that cannot retrospectively taint the guidance with illegality.” However Planning regulations mean public bodies are forced to stick to PHE/ICNIRP guidelines as infrastructure is rolled out, therefore accepting a potentially catastrophic risk for which they could be liable.

Barrie had stopped doing public talks, limited his interviews but this year he has started speaking at meetings.  He has access to classified documents from his time in the military.   This one is from February and is nicely filmed https://youtu.be/Ryf3F9WCAlU

Simon’s attended a January talk his notes are below:

A good summary of the main issues regarding 5G is by a Captain in military intelligence in the Canadian military, Gerry G Flynn ‘Hidden Dangers’, Bowkserm J F Publishing, ISBN 978 1775394518. This is available on Amazon. It includes all the arguments needed in putting forward a case against 5G to the authorities.

There is nothing new to learn about microwaves since an understanding of their negative effects has been with us for a long time. However, action following this knowledge is slow to arise. There are analogies here with the history of smoking: 1870: smoking linked to cancer. By 1939, the science was there to have smoking stopped by it was kept going to make money for the industry.

Microwaves were used for mind control in 1949. Microwaves are able to enter the brain and cause damage to all organs including the heart. In 1952, all the brain frequencies were known and the military tuned machines in order to alter the way that the brain functioned.

1953: microwaves were linked to heart attacks

1956: It was found that pulses could be added to microwaves that would interfere with circadian resonant frequencies (frequencies have 13 circadian frequencies).

In the 1950s, scientists found that microwaves could cause birth defects and organ failures (eg cancer; suicidal wishes). Notwithstanding this, microwaves are still being employed today.

1962: The American CIA started operation ‘Pandora’ – a CIA experiment to see how danger could be caused to people of different nationalities. Hundreds of thousands of people were targeted as part of this operation.

1971: Cancer was proven to be a consequence of low-level microwave frequencies.

The US made the decision that it would be too expensive to have transmitters at a safe distance from human habitation. The US have 800 base worldwide and they decided that it would be too expensive to have transmitters sited in safe places.

1972: 5G used as a weapon for crowd control. 5G is not new – it has been a government weapon since 1972 and there is nothing new about its frequencies. In the early 1970s, the US military had 2000 research documents that all showed menstrual disorders, cancers and other physical ailments stemming from 5G, proving that 5G frequencies could be targeted against anyone that the state wanted. Some/ all (?) of these documents were classified as ‘Top Secret’.

1973: the World Health Organisation (WHO) convened a Top Secret meeting in Warsaw, Poland. They listed 107 different categories of harm (eg disrupted foetal development) from long-term low level frequencies. These are the frequencies that children are exposed to in the classroom. The Americans and the industry wanted the conference kept secret and so the WHO stamped the conference proceedings, entitled ‘The biological effects on health of microwave technology’, as ‘Top Secret’. The US Defence intelligence Agency had said that ‘If the more advanced nations of the west are strict in the enforcement of exposure standards, there would be unfavourable effects on industrial outputs and military function’. SO, it was decided (by whom, the WHO?) that the people could not be told the truth about low-level microwave frequencies. They wanted an exposure level that people would not challenge in court. The WHO leader decided that they would set an exposure level that is still in place today. This standard was set according to the rather relaxed rule that if you did not feel too warm within 6 minutes of exposure to the frequencies, a lifetime exposure to the frequencies would be deemed to be safe.

The WHO deliberately ignored the effect of the electric magnetic vectors, knowing that this does the harm in our organisms. The standard set then still applies today.

The WHO has a list of 4,500 biological structures that can go wrong and – this database has been kept secret – and 80% of the illnesses are microwave-caused.

For children, there is no safe level of microwave exposure. Cancer can be induced into a child on the 15th day of the pregnancy. It takes 18 years of a human’s life to develop a full immune system and microwave frequencies can interfere with the ability to develop this. The 16th week is the most dangerous and if the foetus is female, all the ovarian follicles are in place. A female is born with all the eggs that she will need across a lifetime. The problem is that microwaves will go through the embryonic sack and will stay there because the sack is full of water. The electronic charge builds up in the water in the uterus and obstructs the brain and heart from developing properly.

47% of all births can be stillborn/ miscarriages / genetically damaged (eg autism) as a consequence of the effects of microwave frequencies. This % was corroborated by the European Academy for Environmental Medicine who reached the conclusion that the figure should actually be 48% rather than 47%. The implications? If you are losing half your children per generation, then in the next generation you will lose one quarter. In three generations – in 60 years –only one in 8 of children will be born healthy. In this case, who will look after the infrastructure of society?

Astonishing, bearing this in mind, that OFSTED penalises schools for not installing microwave transmitters in schools. In France and Germany, by contrast, microwave transmitters are being taken out of schools.

The actual death toll from microwave transmitters worldwide estimated by Captain Flynn (this is pre-5G) is 2 billion. This figure of 2 billion is the number of people who would have died in 28 world wars.

India found that cell phones were implicated in brain tumours of 50,000 children. In just two provinces in India, there were 100,000 deaths near towers in two provinces. Across France and Spain, 200 schools have been found with cancer clusters, displaying 8 different types of cancer. A 10-year international study in several countries found hundreds of thousands of people dying around transmitters.

Microwave frequencies were directed at the women protesting at Greenham Common in 1982.

Microwaves are in the same category as the following carcinogens in the WHO literature:

– Lead

– DTT

– Benzine

– Exhaust fumes

– HIV type 2

– Chloroform

– Mercury

The European Parliament published a report recommending banning Wi-Fi in schools within the area of the EU (with its then population of 800m people) and fitting a wired system instead. The telecoms industry and the WHO took the European Parliament to court and forced them to change the word ‘banned’ to ‘a wired system is preferred’.

Is incredibly more dangerous than previous types of microwave frequencies.Whereas transmitters sent out a big beam in all directions, 5G is more like a laser (a concentrated microwave beam). The beam is like a lighthouse and so is infinitely more penetrative and dangerous. The waves from 5G are 1 milimetre up to 5 milimitres. 1 mm – can cause eye defects and skin cancer.

A European legal firm ‘Attorneys and Law’ said that establishing a 5G network would be in contravention of EU regs and Bern and Bonn Conventions amongst others. It breaks about 5 laws.

5G is not new. The Soviets experimented on 5G in 1977 – they exposed 80/90 people as well as cattle and animals for 15 minutes every day over a period of 60 days (ie 15 hours in total). The level of radiation that they were exposed to was the equivalent of 62 on a scale of 1 to 140 which is the maximum at which humans can legally be exposed to microwaves on a non-stop basis. Scientists on the Soviet experiment included: Prof Niberg (Finland) and Prof Hardell (Swedish oncologist) and they found that, in less than 15 hours, there was damage to the skin, liver, heart, brain, adrenal glands and blood (note that blood banks are not permitted to microwave blood since this clots the blood).

5G is particularly dangerous because it is a sweeping beam and will cause a lot of harm to the eyes and the skin. The mamory cells of breasts are also particularly vulnerable to microwaves and this may explain why breast cancer if particularly pronounced near transmitters.

75m trees are being cut down in the UK. Bad news for fish and livestock which depend on trees (3/4 of all living creatures in the sea are dependent on the tree). Note that algae and plankton depend on the trees (decomposed) to feed on and they are the only organisms on the planet that produce dimethyl sulphate which is used for cloud formation. So, if you get rid of trees, you will also get rid of algae and plankton and through that, clouds.

Microwaves can be used with HAARP (16 currently known stations at various locations around the planet), stopping the growth of food and impairing/impeding all growth in living organisms. They can also be used to set up standing waves to cause earthquakes anywhere on the planet.

Barrie is recommending the halt to the installation of satellites. Under the satellites, it is planned to install drones 85,000 feet in the sky, with each drone the width of a football pitch. Trees are designed to collect radiation and the installation of drones will kill all of the trees.

Excerpt of ‘Global Smart Street Lighting & Smart Cities: Market Forecast (2019 – 2028)’ Report for Telensa by Northeast Group, llc

It’s the second year of the conference https://www.6gsummit.com/keynotes/

Please find attached, what’s contained is lifted from parts of this document:  Conflicts of Interest and Misleading Statements in Official Reports about the Health Consequences of Radiofrequency Radiation and Some New Measurements of Exposure Levels Susan Pockett School of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand; s.pockett@auckland.ac.nz Received: 29 March 2019; Accepted: 25 April 2019; Published: 5 May 2019