5G safety lies: Oh, what a tangled web we weave when first we practise to deceive!

5G safety lies: Oh, what a tangled web we weave when first we practise to deceive!

image_pdfimage_print
5G safety lies: O, what a tangled web we weave when first we practise to deceive!
US Sen. Blumenthal blasts FCC and FDA for failing to conduct any research into the safety of 5G technology, and instead, engaging in bureaucratic finger-pointing and deferring to industry
BIG WIRELESS CONCEDES: No studies showing safety of 5G – 7th Feb 2019
Roots of Corruption ICNIRP, PHE (2) Cathy Dowd·Monday, February 4, 2019 (UK-based)
Excerpts:
The Science & Technology Committee received studies and evidence for effects on health in December 2017 and they have to date failed to act on the evidence. Below is the submission of evidence by UK neuroscientist Dr Sarah Starkey to the Westminster Parliamentary Science and Technology Committee for their Inquiry into Early Years Interventions, with a focus on children (info on pregnant women & adults is also included) December 2017. Check out pages 10 – 15. You may want to send this to your MP and ask them to explain why they are not acting on this evidence. Sections of info from the submission is below http://data.parliament.uk/…/evidencebased…/written/75325.pdf.
The AGNIR 2012 report has been shown to be inaccurate, with evidence omitted, conclusions which did not reflect the evidence available, incorrect statements and conflicts of interest185. AGNIR included members from PHE and ICNIRP185. This means that members of PHE as well as members of ICNIRP, who set the international exposure guidelines, have provided inaccurate, incorrect and misleading scientific information. The ICNIRP guidelines no longer reflect the scientific evidence and are no longer protective of human health.
Below excerpt from UK government answer to question from Digital Survivor UK on what health standards are being applied to 5G pilots/rollout in the UK (https://digitalsurvivor.uk/2019/02/07/state-of-5g-in-uk-right-now/): Public Health England’s standards, as dictated by the corrupt ICNIRP (see “ICNIRP cartel” visual here: https://www.kumu.io/Investigate-Europe/das-experten-netzwerk and accompanying article (orig. German): https://www.5gexposed.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/190115_How-harmful-is-5G-really-Der-Tagesspiegel.pdf)

What health standards are being applied to the 5G pilots and eventual rollout in the UK? When were they devised and by whom?

Public Health England’s (PHE’s) Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards (CRCE) takes the lead on public health matters associated with radio-frequency electromagnetic fields, or radio waves, used in telecommunications.

Central to PHE advice is that exposures to radio waves should comply with the guidelines published by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP).

ICNIRP is formally recognised by the World Health Organization (WHO). A considerable amount of research has been carried out on radio waves and we anticipate no negative effects on public health.

(No, ICNIRP standards are both outdated and provenly inadequate in scope for today’s technology let lone 5G – Digitaal Survivor comment.)

A summary of PHE advice on radio waves can be accessed in the following link: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/electromagnetic-fields#radio-waves.

PHE is committed to monitoring the evidence applicable to this and other radio technologies, and to revising its advice, should that be necessary.  [Well, isn’t that nice to know!  Someone had better let them know the whole shebang is a very murky house of cards and very soon their pass-the-scorching-parcel game is going to land them in the dock for crimes against humanity!]


Comments are closed.