Notes re 5G to councillors with 6 additions from Denmark/Sweden

Working groups across the UK, Denmark and the rest of the world are working on material re. 5G to prevent this technology from advancing with detrimental consequences. Please find attached the latest document “Notes for councillors”: WHAT LOCAL COUNCILS NEED TO KNOW ABOUT 5G TECHNOLOGY AND THE GOVERNMENT’S PLANS TO RELAX LOCAL INFRASTRUCTURE LAWS FOR 5G
and here are some additions from biologist and environmental scientist Pernille Schriver in Denmark
1. Increased amounts of energy are required for 5G: https://www.forbes.com/sites/dipkabhambhani/2019/04/22/5g-may-be-holy-grail-for-telecom-but-energy-sector-feels-much-anxiety-over-new-network/#124075286efe https://www.cfr.org/blog/what-5g-means-energy
2. The increased amount of resources required for the massive number of antennas required are unfortunately not included in the debates in the media. If you include the 17 goals of the UN in the debate this alone should prevent the 5G roll out.
3. The Spanish Ombudsman points out that 5G has not had environmental approval http://www.avaate.org/spip.php?article2834&fbclid=IwAR3zFSHDiYtGPFB9LaqzEfN2jOXbCQy4TKdJuliriFbHovw7GhA-F4L_3xY
https://einarflydal.com/2019/09/06/5g-spanias-sivilombud-forlanger-konsekvensutredning/#more-33851
4. The German minister of environment Svenja Schulze states that the continued digitalisation will be fuel on the fire for future environmental problems (Article in Swedish) https://einarflydal.com/2019/08/30/tysklands-miljominister-digitalisering-er-ikke-lenger-losningen-tvertimot/#more-33705
5. The telecommunication companies assesses that the EM background radiation will be increased with 10-20% from 2019 to 2025. See attached Danish file.
6. None of the technologies, 2G, 3G, 4G or 5G, has ever been approved in relation to health or environment. Which other ‘products’ are allowed to be distributed into society on a massive scale without any kind of preliminary assessment?

 

Kind regards
Elizabeth Copeland
Art Director, Film Maker

Note for councillors

 




Cellphones in your pocket – a cautionary tale

I came across your websites via my subscription to freecriticalthinking.org.
I’ve signed up for your newsletter & I’ve shared both your Extinction Rebellion Fraud page & 5G page on my company’s Facebook pages. https://www.facebook.com/Mast.Ireland/ & https://www.facebook.com/LYLMIreland/

I am very much against the introduction of 5G & I’d like to share the following 4G story with you.
During the last week of April, my partner Alicia & I brought our dog Murphy, (pic taken after a recent swim attached), for a swim at Newtownsmith in Dun Laoghaire, which is about 10 minutes walk from where we live. There are deep steps down to the waterline. The steps are 22″ deep & I took one awkwardly. I landed heavily on my right foot & felt the impact in my hip. Over the next few days I experienced an increasing level of discomfort & arranged an appointment with my homeopathic doctor who also happens to be a gifted osteopath. He sorted me out, gave me his 4 in 1 remedy for physical trauma & normal ambulation was restored within a few days.
Around midway through July, I started to feel a burning pain in my right hip & could not attribute it to any physical occurrence. I started dosing myself with the 4 in 1 remedy & upped my daily stretching regime. However, the burning sensation got worse.
I contacted the doc again & went for a session on September 4. He checked me out & got me to perform all kinds of moves. He said that my range of movement was superb and could not discern any physical reason for the pain I was feeling. So, he asked me to go for a fasting blood test & to get my hip X-rayed. Alicia & I were flying to Holland the next day so I told him that I’d make the appointments on our return.
About 3-4 weeks ago, there was an article in Waking Times by Dr Joseph Mercola, which looked at the dangers of 4G radiation from mobile phones. The article specifically mentioned the Samsung Galaxy S9 as emitting radiation that significantly exceeded permitted US levels of radiation.
Alicia & I had upgraded our mobiles on June 2nd. We both got Samsung Galaxy S9s. I have always carried my mobile phone in my right trouser pocket. I immediately ceased this practice & stopped carrying the phone on my person whenever practicable. Within 48 hours, the burning sensation had reduced by around 30%. I contacted the doc & he said that if the symptoms had reduced by 50% on the day before my X-ray appointment, that I should cancel the appointment. The appointment was for September 24th & the symptoms had reduced by about 80%. They have now disappeared completely. A salutary lesson to be sure!
I phoned our national broadcaster, RTE. They declined to use my story.

Regards,
Ciaran



EM-Radiation Research Trust gives notice

For the attention of the Planning Infrastructure Division,
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government,
3rd Floor, Fry Building
2 Marsham Street
London
SW1P 4DF
Friday, 11th October, 2019

To Whom It May Concern:
EM Radiation Research Trust puts UK government on notice regarding 5G amidst profound
world-wide health concerns

The UK EM Radiation Research Trust (RRT) charity was established in 2003. We are leading
supporters of the precautionary approach to electromagnetic radiation. The aim of the charity is to
provide the facts about electromagnetic-radiation and our health to the public, media and officials.
The RRT is supported by independent scientists throughout the world and has over 4000 followers
with some of our posts reaching over 75,000 people.
The EM Radiation Research Trust are the calling for an outright ban for risky untested 5G
technology in response to the UK Government’s consultation calling for proposed reforms to the
permitted development rights for the deployment of 5G to extend mobile coverage. Download the
Governments 5G Consultation here: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/proposedreforms-to-permitted-development-rights-to-support-the-deployment-of-5g-and-extend-mobilecoverage?fbclid=IwAR2OQPVclIWNzx18BC49Hk4Fa0AksUWKvzMjnD6-1q69njsWXv0oP6YAz9Q
Today Friday 11th October, 2019 BT is launching 5G in 20 UK cities. BT’s CEO for the Consumer
Division, Marc Allera, said “We are really excited to be announcing that 5G will be available to our
BT customers so soon after we became the first operator in the UK to launch 5G through EE. We’ll be
launching 5G for BT customers this Friday in 20 large towns and cities across the UK, including
Belfast, Birmingham, Bristol, Cardiff, Coventry, Edinburgh, Leicester, London, and Manchester. We
have 5G in more places than any other operator in the UK.” https://5g.co.uk/news/bt-5g-islaunching-on-friday-in-20-cities-andtowns/5060/?fbclid=IwAR1WZEpPFFa6mEfIcj2w_RQJEPFxOX-7OjcLQGaycbrA7nm61ucZs6ay0X4
It is not appropriate to impose untested 5G radiation throughout the UK.
The EM Radiation Research Trust held an International conference in London on 28th September,
2019 with doctors and scientific experts from around the world discussing the facts regarding 5G.
The presentations are available to download on the Radiation Research Trust website:

September 28th Conference Presentations


2
The rollout of 5G in the UK will dramatically increase the number of radiofrequency transmitters,
leading to an increase in microwave radiofrequency exposures for the public, pollinating insects and
other wildlife.
Today we see the release of a report that holds significant implications for the 5G project. Written by
Professor Tom Butler, social scientist at the University College, Cork. The paper highlights the most
recent published research and delves into past historic papers on RF/EMF radiation. This paper
poses serious questions for our future, especially the future of our children’s health and well-being
which is under significant threat. Our children are receiving no precautionary guidance for the use
of mobile phones, smartphones, tablets and now the internet of things including the proliferation of
microwave non-ionising radiation frequency communication systems that are needed to service and
connect these devices such as wifi, smart meters, 2G, 3G, 4G and now the threat of 5G masts on
every street. Please take time to read and understand the potential effect of electromagnetic
pollution for public health and the environment. This issue has caused increased concern around the
world for the future of humanity. On the Clear Evidence of the Risks from Non-Ionizing Radio
Frequency Radiation: The Case of Digital Technologies in the Home, Classroom and Society.
Download the paper here: https://www.radiationresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Onthe-Clear-Evidence-of-the-Risks-to-Children-from-Smartphone-and-WiFi-Radio-FrequencyRadiation-Final-2019.pdf
Harmful effects of microwave radiofrequency signals below the current International Commission
on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) guidelines have been well documented in the
scientific literature. These included damage to fertility, development, behaviour and increased cell
death. Radiofrequency signals were classified as a possible human carcinogen in 2011 by the World
Health Organization International Agency for Research on Cancer. But the evidence of increased
cancer risks has since been strengthened by further human studies, as well as toxicology studies in
animals, which demonstrated clear evidence of tumours (US National Toxicology Program and the
Italian Ramazzini Institute study). Despite this, the Government is racing ahead with 5G rollout and
the involuntary irradiation of the whole UK population.
Many scientists have called for action to better protect the public, at www.emfscientist.org , for the
current ICNIRP guidelines to be rejected as not being protective of health, at www.emfcall.org , and
for 5G rollout to be halted until adequate safety studies have been done, at www.5Gappeal.eu.
1. Given that 5G rollout will greatly increase radiofrequency exposures for the UK public:
i. how will the UK Government protect its citizens from the harmful effects of radiofrequency
signals already documented in the scientific literature?
ii. how will the UK Government safeguard the health and development of babies, children and
young people from the damaging effects of radiofrequency signals already documented in
the scientific literature?
iii. how will the UK Government prevent damage to pollinating insects and other wildlife from
increased radiofrequency exposures?
2. Why is there no safety testing before the rollout of 5G throughout the UK and who is
responsible? Pre-market safety testing for new food and medicines are required before release for
public consumption and are not allowed to be marketed if they fail animal toxicity tests. The whole
UK population will be exposed to untested and unregulated radiation which they will absorb into
their bodies and without any public agreement.
Too many reports and reviews delay and deny the precautionary approach due to economic
interests. It’s time for action. We are deeply concerned that special interests and industry lobbying
are playing a role in this denial. We demand accountability for the imposition of this technology in
every corner of our lives, and we demand accountability on the part of the individuals who are
voting to put this technology in place without a single safety test having been conducted as
established by US Senator Blumenthal during Congressional hearings on 5G.
No one is checking if the carrier is operating within so-called “safety” limits, leaving the Government
and Industry wide open for legal challenge. Leading independent experts recently presented at a
3
meeting in Germany and at the European Parliament. Dr Marc Arazi provided evidence (SAR tests
reports from approved laboratory) proving that it is not possible to trust the mobile industry who
knowingly overexposed the public to microwave radiation well beyond the so-called limits with 9
out of 10 mobile phoned failing the “safety” standards following testing by a French Government
Agency in 2012 in real use (at contact to the body). Download Dr Arazi’s presentation here:
https://www.phonegatealert.org/en/dr-arazis-presentation-at-the-international-scientificconference-in-mainz-germany
Dr Marc Arazi said: “We have been subjected to more radiation that manufacturers said for
more than 20 years.” And the UK Government expects us to trust the Government and Industry
with the launch of 5G throughout the UK with no pre-market testing or post-market control
allowing 5G antennas on every street within a few feet of people’s homes, without any informed
consent and no opportunity to object on any grounds including control, our freedom and our health
due to the relaxed UK planning laws?
Furthermore, the so-called “safety” limits are irrelevant because they only protect against acute
thermal effects from very short and intense exposure. It’s time for the UK Government to wake up
and remember who they represent. Are they not aware that our “safety standards” do not protect
against harmful effects from low-intensity and long-term exposure such as cancer, reproductive
harm, or effects on the nervous system and what about autism, birth defects and infertility? These
effects are convincingly shown to appear from chronic exposure at intensities below the ICNIRP
limits.
The introduction of 5G throughout the UK will add to the discrimination against those who are
currently suffering with electrosensitivity (ES). What sort of society are we consigning those who
are suffering with ES to live their lives in pain, enforced poverty and isolation? How will people
suffering with ES survive in a world saturated with 5G? There will be no place to hide.
We are also concerned for our freedom and control. Our own Prime Minister Boris Johnson
presented a speech about the ‘Internet of Things’ at the United Nations Assembly on 24th September,
2019 and said: “We need to find the right balance between freedom and control; between
innovation and regulation; between private enterprise and government oversight.We must insist
that the ethical judgements inherent in the design of new technology are transparent to all. And we
must make our voices heard more loudly in the standards bodies that write the rules. Above all, we
need to agree a common set of global principles to shape the norms and standards that will guide
the development of emerging technology.” Download the full transcript here:
https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/pm-speech-to-the-un-general-assembly-24-
september-2019 Also view Boris Johnson’s presentation here:

The Planetary Association for Clean Energy (PACE) also submitted a statement to the UN revealing
that allowable international “radiation limits will need to be increased by 30 to 40% “ in order to
make 5G deployment technologically feasible and calls 5G “an experiment on humanity that
constitutes cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment” in violation of more than 15 international
treaties and agreements. The report also highlights the fact that despite what is being portrayed in
mainstream, wireless radiation has biological effects and this is not a subject for debate. This was
already established more than 60 years ago when the US Department of Defense tested the impact
of EMR on animals and human beings under a variety of conditions. These biological effects are
seen in all life forms—plants, animals, insects and microbes. There are more than 10,000 peerreviewed studies pertaining to the health impacts of EMR and substantial evidence for the
cumulative nature and eventual irreversibility of some effects, whether
neurological/neuropsychiatric, reproductive, cardiac, mutations in DNA, or hormonal effects. Some
may affect the evolution of the human race. Download the report here: https://whatis5g.info/wpcontent/uploads/2019/04/PACE-EMR-contribution-Feb.-11th-2019.pdf
Russian research has clearly demonstrated biological effects during research on rats and humans
when exposed to millimeter radiowaves. This research was published in 1977 and translated and
4
declassified by the CIA in 2012 and clearly shows health problems in the skin, liver, heart, brain,
adrenal glands and blood. This is very daunting science and it is critically important. Download
here: https://www.radiationresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/emf-USSR-biologicaleffect-microwaves-skin-organs-blood-bone-marrow-reflex-enzymes-nucleic-metabolism-1977-
JPRSCIA.pdf?fbclid=IwAR24TfMP39JBeFpdQxStJKIsS0vzTRcBuyzEBevQQC5lBm8GSNM0HewYNW4
It is of no surprise that the Russian standards are much lower than the UK. The Chairman for the
Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection and member for the
International Advisory Committee (IAC) of the World Health Organization’s EMF Project Professor
Oleg Grigoriev recently provided a stark warning about 5G saying: “5G Maybe like a slow
Hiroshima.” His predecessor Professor Yury Grigoriev has also given many warnings and powerful
presentation’s with regards to non-ionising radiation. His expertise is second to none with regards
to both ionising and non-ionising radiation. Professor Yury Grigoriev was called upon to help
contain the Chernobyl disaster. The Radiation Research Trust invited him to offer his expert
opinion regarding EMF exposures. He said: “The human brain and the nervous system tissues
directly perceive EMF and react irrespective of its intensity, and in certain cases it depends on EMF
modulation. The current standards are out dated and inadequate. Urgent action is needed to curb
the negative impact from this physical agent.” He also said: “Man conquered the Black Plague, but
he has created new problems – EMF pollution.”
The clock has now started ticking on liability. Swiss Re Group is one of the world’s leading insurance
providers and recently rated 5G as a “high impact” risk affecting property and casualty claims within
3 years. Download the Swiss Re report here: https://www.radiationresearch.org/articles/swissre-rated-5g-highimpact/?fbclid=IwAR1asU6TTPcTR1uZEaswbl9hppH_3oliIKO0GoMJimoFvk4B5PsbK73Fk-4
What compensation will the Government provide for UK citizens against 5G personal injuries
or reduced property values?
See additional research and information.
PHIRE 5G – 5 Facts leaflet: http://phiremedical.org/tag/5g/
Understanding EMFs: https://sites.google.com/site/understandingemfs/thescience?fbclid=IwAR0T4_sJbKGTpLIlJ5_kEr8b4NyWmDu1x4HuTEKKj6EXt4ct_4jm977m37c
No more excuses. Public Health England (PHE), ICNIRP, Scientific Committee on Emerging and
Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR), the industry and the UK Government are fully informed
and well aware of the dangers associated with this technology and to proceed without caution could
lead to officials being held to account for damages to public health as a result of wireless technology
due to serious management failures in a gross breach of duty of care.
This letter will be made publically available to enable the public to present directly to their MP,
councillors and public officials. Officials will not be able to claim that they ‘didn’t know’ in a court of
law in the future as this letter and enclosed submissions will hold them accountable and guilty for
forcing electromagnetic radiation upon the general public without prior consent. The public may be
left with no alternative but to make a criminal complaint against those decision makers and seek a
prosecution and a claim for compensation. Decision makers who fail to protect public health should
be held personally responsible for serious breach of duty and put on notice for betraying public
trust by ignoring the evidence on the hazards of RF/EMF.
As of 11th October, 2019 the UK Government has irrefutably received this letter drawing attention to
information including links to websites containing the latest science and appeals from doctors and
scientists. We reiterate that the UK Government and their advisors are aware of the risks of EMFs
and of concerns regarding the dangers associated with current wireless technology and 5G.
WE ARE HOLDING THEM TO ACCOUNT AND PUTTING THEM ON NOTICE
5
Sincerely,
Eileen O’Connor
Eileen O’Connor
Director
EM Radiation Research Trust
www.radiationresearch.org
References:
1) https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/proposed-reforms-to-permitteddevelopment-rights-to-support-the-deployment-of-5g-and-extend-mobilecoverage?fbclid=IwAR2OQPVclIWNzx18BC49Hk4Fa0AksUWKvzMjnD6-
1q69njsWXv0oP6YAz9Q
2) https://5g.co.uk/news/bt-5g-is-launching-on-friday-in-20-cities-andtowns/5060/?fbclid=IwAR1WZEpPFFa6mEfIcj2w_RQJEPFxOX7OjcLQGaycbrA7nm61ucZs6ay0X4
3) https://www.radiationresearch.org/campaigns/september-28th-conferencepresentations/
4) https://www.radiationresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/On-the-ClearEvidence-of-the-Risks-to-Children-from-Smartphone-and-WiFi-Radio-FrequencyRadiation-Final-2019.pdf
5) www.emfscientist.org
6) www.emfcall.org
7) www.5Gappeal.eu
8) https://www.phonegatealert.org/en/dr-arazis-presentation-at-the-internationalscientific-conference-in-mainz-germany
9) https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/pm-speech-to-the-un-general-assembly-24-
september-2019
10)https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOLIHjG4NKU&feature=youtu.be
11)https://whatis5g.info/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/PACE-EMR-contribution-Feb.-11th2019.pdf
12)https://www.radiationresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/emf-USSR-biologicaleffect-microwaves-skin-organs-blood-bone-marrow-reflex-enzymes-nucleic-metabolism1977-JPRSCIA.pdf?fbclid=IwAR24TfMP39JBeFpdQxStJKIsS0vzTRcBuyzEBevQQC5lBm8GSNM0HewY
NW4
13)https://www.radiationresearch.org/articles/swiss-re-rated-5g-highimpact/?fbclid=IwAR1asU6TTPcTR1uZEaswbl9hppH_3oliIKO0GoMJimoFvk4B5PsbK73Fk
-4
14)http://phiremedical.org/tag/5g
15)https://sites.google.com/site/understandingemfs/thescience?fbclid=IwAR0T4_sJbKGTpLIlJ5_kEr8b4NyWmDu1x4HuTEKKj6EXt4ct_4jm977m3
7c
The EM Radiation Research Trust is an educational organisation funded by donations. An independent Charity
Registered No. 1106304 © The EM Radiation Research Trust 2003-2004
Contact address: Chairman Mr. Brian Stein CBE, Radiation Research Trust, Chetwode House, Leicester Road,
Melton Mowbray, Leicestershire, LE13 1GA, UK

 

NB Saorry the links are not live but on this copy they are. Click here.




Stop 5G International Appeal update

Dear all
Some while back I saw that David at david@unfamilylawreform.co.uk had an exchange with Milton Keynes Council. I was once again shocked at the ignorance and complacency exhibited by David’s correspondents.
I wanted to get back to David with further evidence that he could present, but it has taken me some time to finish that particular project.  Finally, though, I have managed to do so.  I entitled my article “Chronolo-5G: How the Telecom Companies Are Losing the Battle to Impose 5G Against the Will of the People” because it is intended to be a chronology of the pushback against 5G in 2019, but unfortunately Global Research gave the article a rather undescriptive name: 5G Cell Phone Radiation: How the Telecom Companies Are Losing the Battle to Impose 5G Against the Will of the People: https://www.globalresearch.ca/telcos-losing-battle-impose-5g/5691065.
It is a chronology of as much of the information as possible that has been published in 2019 showing the unutterable madness and criminality of rolling out 5G.  I would hope that, as this is all new information in 2019, campaigners can use these devastating facts in order to help their campaigning.  I draw your attention in particular to some health aspects: highest suicide rate in the US since WWII, first three-year drop in life expectancy since WWI, one in two newborns expected to be autistic by 2025, British insurers confirm premature death trend …  There is more such horrendous material proving that we stand at the very edge of catastrophe and must turn back now.  We must eliminate all WiFi and not just 5G, for these reasons (given by Arthur Firstenberg and published in my last newsletter):
There should be no wireless technology, period. If you have wireless technology at all, you are being irradiated. This business of “low” radiation is wishful thinking and completely contrary to science. “Low levels” is completely meaningless if you are talking about any effects except heating. For all other effects, there is not a dose response. There are no studies showing a dose response, and there are a lot of studies showing the opposite. Pulsed, digital, high-bandwidth radiation kills regardless of power. Often the highest exposure levels have very little effect and the near-zero exposure levels kill. Why? Because our cells communicate at
near-zero levels and it is the interference with our own bodies’ internal signals that kills us. The more the external signal matches our tiny internal signals, the greater the harm. I keep on saying this, people nod their heads and they go on demanding “lower” limits like sheep led to the slaughter. The higher the exposure level, the greater the thermal damage. The lower the exposure level, the greater the informational damage. WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY MUST BE BANNED, PERIOD.
It is time for us to adopt a consistent message.  The only safe dose for artificial electromagnetic radiation is ZERO because it is alien to our biology.  Shilly shallying, advising people to paint their walls with lead, buy shungite talismans, try (if at all possible and we know that it must be quite impossible for you, poor dears) to switch off their phones and routers will not do.  We must be clear.  There is one solution only to the 5G threat to all life on Earth: stop all generations of wireless technology right now.  If you believe that this is not possible, you are condemning this campaign to failure and should book yourself a nice beach holiday while you wait out your last few months of life.  You do not debate with a weapon.  You do not compromise with a weapon.  We have computers, we can get cables to plug phones into routers.  We do not need WiFi and it is killing all life on Earth except bacteria (lucky them!).
Another of my most recent articles sets out to document how we came to have 5G (The 5G Dementors Meet the 4G Zombie Apocalypsehttps://www.globalresearch.ca/5g-electromagnetic-mad-zone-poised-self-destruct-5g-dementors-meet-4g-zombie-apocalypse/5689176).  This gives an account of the conspiracy that brought us here.  It is a 5-page article with 12 pages of notes.  As a former UN editor, I always document what I am saying and I recommend a close perusal of the 12 pages of notes for they are illuminating.  I would hope that that information, too, would be a useful tool for campaigning.
A further article, BBC Fake News on 5G Decoded: Health Impacts Denied Despite Overwhelming Scientific Evidence (https://www.globalresearch.ca/online-bbc-fake-news-5g-decoded/5687055) debunks the usual stupid arguments put forward to dispute what the International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space (https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal/) asserts (although disputing the facts is rather pointless since we provided 122 references to support our assertions).   BBC Fake News on 5G Decoded debunks ICNIRP, the World Health Organization and the idea that we have lived for aeons with natural electromagnetic radiation so we don’t need to worry about the artificial version.  I provide hyperlinks throughout to the source material.
I am also attaching my latest newsletter, at the end of which are links to six of the seven previous newsletters (the seventh currently has no home), all of which contain links to some crucial documents and information.  All the newsletters are intended to be read electronically.  I will not be producing any more newsletters as it is too time-consuming (the last one had 208 pages), but am now devoting myself to the production of articles.  The next article will address the dangers of 5G from space and the stratosphere.
I hope that these articles (which I am attaching in case you wish to print and disseminate them) and newsletters will be able to support your campaigning.  5G Cell Phone Radiation: How the Telecom Companies Are Losing the Battle to Impose 5G Against the Will of the People) shows that we are winning the information war hands down.  If officials refuse to listen despite our presentation of the facts, we must move to impose liability and eventually should consider new Nuremberg trials for crimes against humanity.
Good luck with your campaigning!
Claire
Claire Edwards



Green Party Conference Stop 5G Demo Report

Dear 5G Concerned,
 
Today people from across the country came to make a stand outside Green Party Autumn Conference regarding their deafening silence on Electro-Magnetic Radiation Pollution and 5G – kindly see enclosed picture. Green Party members and non-members from Lampeter, Stroud, Bristol, Reading and The Isle of Wight came to speak Truth to Power, something which the Green party traditionally prides itself upon, but which it sadly does not apply in this area. 
 
The Protest was a success in that we got to speak to many people, including several key people within the Party. It was filmed by Media company Vice and will appear online. Many leaflets were handed out and I went inside during Plenary to ask for our EMR Motion – which was well supported and well researched – to be reinstated. Sadly, it was ruled out of order again due to “procedural rules” which are obviously being used to thwart any discussion on the subject. I then raised my voice and spoke Truth to Power from the inside, pointing out that the Green Party are missing the boat on this and how Ecology has all but been eradicated from its Agenda, making them lose valuable members. There were many people in the hall and some later came out to support us. Still, the Party Elite are not listening and there are too many members who choose to remain ignorant in favour of a one-eyed Climate Agenda. The full force of the leadership’s anger was made clear when the Conference “organiser” was sent out to tell us that we are not allowed to stand outside the venue to protest on Saturday as I had “disrupted Conference.” I had done no such thing. I had merely spoken out against a corrupt and unjust handling of two motions with almost Kafkaesk consequences – first claiming we didn’t have an underpinning policy then claiming we didn’t ask for action – putting us in a Catch 22 situation where the only avenue left to us is to protest.
 
The Green Party are supposed to be the Party of Free Speech – we have been silenced and now stifled. The Green Party are supposed to be the Party of inclusion and against discrimination in all its forms. What about the Electro-hyper sensitive? The Green Party are supposed to be the Party that promotes local sustainable solutions. Why then do they support a lean mean corporate control green-wash spin machine? Why have they left the Precautionary Principle by the wayside? Where is the pioneering debate about the need for safe and bio-sensitive Technology? The mind boggles and the heart crumples.
 
But I will not be stifled or crumpled. I will be there again tomorrow from noon and those of you who want to stand with me are welcome to join. We urgently need to bring back our Party to its original values where Ecology and the Environment are seen as one integrated whole which needs to be tackled as one. 
 
I am looking forward to seeing you there.
 
Best wishes from Tanja the 5G Rebel